[9] Michael McGerr. The Price of the ‘New Transnational History’ [J]. American Historical Review, Vol.96 (1991): 1056.

[10]Ian Tyrrell. Responds [J]. American Historical Review, Vol. 96(1991): 1068.

[11]伊曼纽尔·沃勒斯坦 罗荣渠等译. 现代世界体系（第一卷）[M].高等教育出版社, 1998年.

[12]Immannual Wallerstein. Unthinking Social Science: The Limits of Nineteenth-Century Paradigms[M]. Polity Press, 1991.

[13] Russell Jacoby. A New Intellectual History?[J]American Historical Review, Vol. 97 (1992): 405.

[14]Dominick Lacapra. Intellectual History and Its Ways[J]. American Historical Review, Vol.97(1992): 425.  [15]David Harlan. Intellectual History and the Return of Literature[J]. American Historical Review, Vol. 94 (1989): 581.

[16]David A. Hollinger. The Return of the Prodigal: The Persistence of Historical Knowing[J]. American Historical Review, Vol.94 (1989): 610.

[17] David Harlan. Reply to David Hollinger[J]. American Historical Review, Vol. 94 (1989): 622.

[18]John E. Toews. Intellectual History after the Linguistic Turn: The Autonomy of Meaning and the Irreducibility of Experience[J]. American Historical Review., Vol. 92 (1987): 879;

[19]Richard Harvey Brown. Positivism, Relativism, and Narrative in the Logic of the Historical Sciences[J]. American Historical Review, Vol. 92 (1987): 908.

[20]Thomas S. Kuhn. The Structure of Scientific Revolution[M], Chicago , 1970.

[21]T. S. 库恩著  李宝恒 纪树立译. 科学革命的结构[M].上海科学技术出版社1980年.

[22]David Hollinger. T. S. Kuhn’s Theory of Science and Its Implications for History[J].American Historical Review, Vol. 78(1973): 370-392.

[23]科恩  鲁旭东译. 科学中的革命[M]. 商务印书馆, 1998年.

[24]Joan Wallach Scott, History in Crisis? The Others’

 << 上一页  [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] 下一页