r Erik Seidenfaden〈暹羅境內的泰族〉：“暹羅境內的吉蔑人，位於巫里喃（武里南）、素粦（素林）、固康、烏汶、黎逸、甲米和達叻等府”。[58]所以，循著建立國家的“人”的線索，“陸真臘史”蓋“柬埔寨史”的部分，而非“老撾史”或“泰國史”可以溯源的“主體”部分。猶如昔日爲“扶南”、“真臘”所有包括整個湄公河三角洲的今越南南部史，“大越國”割奪前爲“柬埔寨史”部份，割奪後爲“越南史”部份。
New Study on Wendan State
and Questionabout Zhenla’s Territory 、
Abstract: Where was Wendan state situated? Many Chinese scholars might tell that it was Vientiane, the capital of Laos since the special paper made by Huang Shengzhang was published. There was the description of too larger extension to falling short of the record about the ‘Land Zhenla’ and something wrong in the argumentation on the political geography in the northern border areas of the Khmer kingdom in the article. With moving the traveling line from Huanzhou to Wendan state southwestward all the time, you would got a place named Mukdahan in Thailand that was accorded much more with the conditions about Wendan state. From this viewpoint, a new map on Zhenla’s territory during pre-Angkor period had been drawn up: It limited with Giai Nui Truong Son in the east, Mai Nam Chao Phraya in the west and bordered on Mekongk in the north and Gulf of Thailand in the south. Compared with the land&
上一页 [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] 下一页
