|
A 102(1987),281-291;283.Also inhis"The Function of the Litaerary Theory at the Present Time,"in Ralph Cohen,ed.,The Future of Literary Theory,Routledge,1989,pp.102-111.
[4]Stephen Greenblatt,"Shakespeare and the exorcists,"inRobert Con Davis and Ronald Schleifer,eds,.ContemporaryLiterary Criticism,New York and London:Longman,1989,P,429.
[5]Stephen Greenblatt,"Towards a Poetics of Culture,"in H. Aram veeser,ed.,The New Historicism,New York:Routledge,1989,PP.1-13.
[6]这一点显然又是对米勒的误解。其实米勒文中提及的语言和社会、历史的对立，是对学界一种流行意见的转述，而并非他本人的看法。他在近年来所发表的一系列文章中都一再强调解构主义并不是脱离历史、脱离政治的纯语言修辞性的批评。我们前面所提到的《文学理论在今天的功能》一文，对这一论点进行了详尽的阐发。
[7]Louis A. Montrose,"The Poetics and Politics of Culture,"in H. Aram Veeser,ed.,The New Historicism,Routledge,1989,p.15;
【编 者 按】.16-17,pp.19-20.
[8]Louis A. Montrose,"The Poetics and Politics of Culture,"in H. Aram Veeser,ed.,The New Historicism,Routledge,1989,p.15;
【编 者 按】.16-17,pp.19-20.
[9]参见Brook Thomas,The New Historicism and Other Old.Fashioned Topics,Princeton University Press,1991,p.32.
[10]Fredric Jameson,The Political Unconscious,CornellUniversity Press,1981,p.82.
[11]Elizabeth Fox-Genovese,"Literary Criticism and thePolitics of the New Historicism,"in H. Aram Veeser,ed.,TheNew Historicism,P.214.
[12]Stephen Greenblatt,Renaissance Self-Fashioning:FromMore to Shakespeare,The University of chicago Press,1980,pp.18-25.
[13]同注(11),p.216.此文的中译本译为：“当代批评家倾向于认为，历史就是历史学家描写过去事情的方式，至于历史上究竟发生过什么事情，上一页 [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] 下一页 |
|
