|
，日本近年的历史教科书问题也是一个明显表现，当然这种现象在近代以来非常普遍，可参看杜赞奇（Prasenjit Duara）：Rescuing History from the Nation: Questioning Narratives of Modern China, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995。
[xxviii] 《后现代历史学》，第39页。
[xxix] Why History,14-15.
[xxx] 《后现代历史学》，第18页。
[xxxi] Why History, 29.
[xxxii] Ankersmit,291.
[xxxiii] Brenda Marshall, Teaching the Postmodern(London,1992), 4.转见In Defence of History,165.
[xxxiv] Re-thinking History,69.
[xxxv] Re-thinking History,31.
[xxxvi] Re-thinking History,38-39.
[xxxvii] The Postmodern History Reader,20.
[xxxviii] The Postmodern History Reader,6.
[xxxix] Gabrielle Spiegel, “History and postmodernism,” The Postmodern History Reader,262.
[xl] N.Geras, “Language, Truth and Justice,” The Postmodern History Reader,23.
[xli] Ankersmit,291.
[xlii] In Defence of History,211.
[xliii] 《后现代历史学》，第44页。
[xliv] Lawrence Stone, “History and postmodernism,” The Postmodern History Reader,242.
[xlv] In Defence of History,4.
[xlvi] David Harlan, The Degradation of American History (Chicago,1997),xx..转见In Defence of History,4.
[xlvii] Deconstructing history,1.
[xlviii] 见Windschuttles：《西方历史编篡学的后现代转向批判》（李凌翔译，载《东岳论丛》2004年第4期），第25页。
[xlix] Lawrence Stone, “History and postmodernism,” The Postmodern History Reader,243.
[l] Lawrence Stone, “Dry Heat, Cool Reason: Historians under Siege in England&nbs << 上一页 [11] [12] [13] [14] 下一页 |
|
